|
Page 5 of 7
Widening Access to Cultural Products
The
proliferation of cultural products offers enormous and ever-growing
possibilities for all citizens in Europe. This
is especially true for the rapid growth of electronic cultural content. The
recent technological innovations and advances have profoundly changed the ways
cultural goods are distributed, reproduced and consumed. But in order to realize
the full potential of the Internet, and for each citizen to realize their own
potential, the full range of online content needs to be made available to all -
quickly, easily and in a form appropriate to the individuals' needs.
Cultural
institutions and organisations are making significant amounts of online content
available to their respective communities - in education, museums, archives,
research, public libraries, and so on. However, as the Common Information
Environment, a group of public sector stakeholders observes,
"the barriers between [cultural] sectors mean that not all this content is
accessible to all who might need it or want it. Too much remains hidden amongst
the low-quality information that clutters the web and behind technical, commercial
and administrative barriers."
In order
to achieve a more inclusive Europe, and a true cultural democracy in Europe, it is crucial that the barriers to the free flow
of ideas and knowledge between different communities and cultural sectors are
dismantled. For the individual citizens, inclusion means creating equal
opportunities, chances for all to participate in the global exchange of
cultural goods and content. For the communities, inclusion means enjoying, without
barriers, and actively recreating their
own cultural heritage.
On various
levels and in various fields of cultural production, different civic organizations,
communities and stakeholders have already contributed to the dismantling of
these barriers and the widening of access to cultural goods and works of art:
the BBC has opened its Creative Archive ; the various free
software and "copyleft" movements have initiated the introduction of new,
non-commercial licenses for the distribution of documents, software, and works
of art; the Creative Commons initiative has established a range of copyright
techniques for the authors and producers of cultural goods from which they
can select the licensing option best suiting their artistic and economic interests;
and so on. The governments are lagging
behind in this process; it is their turn now to take initiative.
The
Adelphi Charter on Creativity, Innovation and Intellectual Property - prepared
by international experts from the arts, creative industries, human rights, law,
economics, science, R&D, technology, the public sector and education,
including Gilberto Gil, Brazilian Minister of Culture - responds to one of the
most profound challenges of the 21st century: How to ensure that everyone has access to
ideas and knowledge, and that intellectual property laws do not become too
restrictive?
The
Charter states that "The expansion in the law's breadth, scope and term over the
last 30 years has resulted in an intellectual property regime which is radically
out of line with modern technological, economic and social trends. This
threatens the chain of creativity and innovation on which we and future
generations depend."
In order
to overcome this trend and to promote a new, fair, user-friendly and efficient
way of handing out intellectual property rights in the 21st century, the Charter
sets out new principles for copyrights and patents (see the Document below). The
Charter emphasizes the crucial role of
governments in initiating policies to stimulate creativity, innovation, and
access - especially for those underprivileged citizens who currently have
lesser opportunities to encounter with the wide range of cultural
products.
Besides
action on the side of the governments, it is important that a common European
strategy is developed to reform the existing intellectual property regulation.
The European IP regime of the 21st
century should focus on the dual aims to improve productivity and
competitiveness in the global economic arena and to provide the European
citizens with a wider access to cultural goods as a source of their
creativity.
* *
*
Document
Adelphi
Charter on Creativity, Innovation and Intellectual Property
Humanity's
capacity to generate new ideas and knowledge is its greatest asset. It is the
source of art, science, innovation and economic development. Without it,
individuals and societies stagnate.
This
creative imagination requires access to the ideas, learning and culture of
others, past and present.
Human
rights call on us to ensure that everyone can create, access, use and share
information and knowledge, enabling individuals, communities and societies to
achieve their full potential.
Creativity
and investment should be recognised and rewarded. The purpose of intellectual
property law (such as copyright and patents) should be, now as it was in the
past, to ensure both the sharing of knowledge and the rewarding of innovation.
The
expansion in the law's breadth, scope and term over the last 30 years has
resulted in an intellectual property regime which is radically out of line with
modern technological, economic and social trends. This threatens the chain of
creativity and innovation on which we and future generations depend.
We call
upon governments and the international community to adopt these
principles.
- Laws
regulating intellectual property must serve as means of achieving creative,
social and economic ends and not as ends in themselves.
- These
laws and regulations must serve, and never overturn, the basic human rights to
health, education, employment and cultural life.
- The
public interest requires a balance between the public domain and private rights.
It also requires a balance between the free competition that is essential for
economic vitality and the monopoly rights granted by intellectual property
laws.
- Intellectual
property protection must not be extended to abstract ideas, facts or data.
- Patents
must not be extended over mathematical models, scientific theories, computer
code, methods for teaching, business processes, and methods of medical
diagnosis, therapy or surgery.
- Copyright
and patents must be limited in time and their terms must not extend beyond what
is proportionate and necessary.
- Government
must facilitate a wide range of policies to stimulate access and innovation,
including non-proprietary models such as open source software licensing and open
access to scientific literature.
- Intellectual
property laws must take account of developing countries' social and economic
circumstances.
- In making
decisions about intellectual property law, governments should adhere to these
rules:
-
There
must be an automatic presumption against creating new areas of intellectual
property protection, extending existing privileges or extending the duration of
rights.
-
The
burden of proof in such cases must lie on the advocates of
change.
-
Change
must be allowed only if a rigorous analysis clearly demonstrates that it will
promote people's basic rights and economic well-being.
-
Throughout,
there should be wide public consultation and a comprehensive, objective and
transparent assessment of public benefits and detriments.
We call
upon governments and the international community to adopt these
principles.
|