|
A memo sent to correspondents,
friends and acquaintances of The Budapest Observatory in
February 2001
Dear Colleagues,
I was warned about the
shortness of the last message. Indeed, less than 600 words. On the other hand,
in order to respect your time, a ceiling of 800 words will be observed.
Country by country
Staying with
statistics: the number of files on specific aspects of financing culture in 18
countries in east-central Europe, accessible via our web site, has gone beyond
one hundred. The country which is best covered can be observed through 12
files; those who believe it is Hungary, are wrong. For the right answer, go to http://www.budobs.org/country.htm
. Having also in mind the Useful links section, the BO site can now
really claim to be a portal.
Chances of the Internet
The latest few
inclusions present the findings of one section of the Open Society Institute -
Center for Publishing Development survey, conducted about the prospects of the
use of Internet in homes, libraries and schools in (among others) our region.
The issue has relevance to finances. Where do you think money matters more when
it is about the spreading of Internet: at libraries or at schools? For the
answers in the survey follow the route given above.
As the elaboration of
the survey proceeds comparative tables on further topics will be on display at
the OSI site, with access from ours. Next comes book distribution.
Tax incentives
The country profiles
have been updated to reflect conditions in 2001. Changes are not always for the
better: until last year Lithuanian law offered 200% tax reduction to donors to
good causes, from now it is the dull 100% like elsewhere. I have not heard any
explanation. Were businesses too generous? Or just no-one watched the hands of
the finance minister as he was preparing amendments to tax legislation? Who
knows more?
Zsofia Foldesi, new BO
staff member, has dug out a few new pages from the internet, presenting now
Latvia, Macedonia and Yugoslavia, too. (This reminds me of the many promises
collected in this respect from Albania and Bosnia. Also our less than complete
Czech and Romanian pages.)
Screening the web
pages of the European Union produced an interesting document in this field. A Communication
from the commission of a few years ago - no more recent information was
found - on the assistance given to ngo-s in the member states. This includes
references to tax reliefs, which we labouriously cut out and added to our
collection: http://www.budobs.org/eu-donation.htm
The summarising done
for the Council of Europe (see previous memo) contributed to our conceptual
clearsightedness in the maze of sponsoring, donation, gifts etc. Hopefully the
respective pages of our site confirm this statement.
Palyazatok
I keep the Hungarian
word (with accents in the original), which comfortably denotes both the
processes as well as the items to be presented at - tenders, calls for
proposal, competitions and applications... It is often not easy to find the
correct English equivalent.
Anyway, with two of
the early projects reaching relative completion (on public grants and tax
incentives), it is time to venture into new fields. BO participates in a number
of palyazatok now and preparations are being taken about new projects:
areas where phenomena of cultural finances can be compared between countries.
The crucial thing is not to identify the
topic, I believe, even from the funders' point of view. The most important is
to find the right people who guarantee success. If we see potentials in an idea
and the persons behind, BO will do its best to get the necessary means.
(Money.) I hope to be more specific next time.
The Visegrad Fund
This Fund is accessible
only for the four members, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia. For
the others a look at here tells about
the functioning of a subregional fund, with cultural content also.
Bigger, better, beautiful?
By the time of the
next BO memo the outline paper on the European conference planned for February
2002 with this title will be complete and I can report about early developments
in the preparation. The subject will be the impact of EU enlargement on
cultural opportunities across Europe, seen from both sides. (Actually even from
more angles.) The idea came from Euclid, London, with whom BO is busy
preparing, involving the EU cultural contact point for Hungary. We expect
altogether about 200 participants.
|