|
A memo sent to correspondents, friends and acquaintances of the Budapest
Observatory (BO) in February 2004
Small
BO staff has been buried with preparing the content sessions at the next IETM
get-together in April.
Come
to Budapest!
A
few days remain till the registration
deadline
for the Informal European Theatre Meeting.
Dissecting Culture 2000
It
has felt good to find several references to the BO analysis of Culture 2000 grants, including
in the e-zine
of C2000.
We
are not alone in this zeal, others did the same. BO learned from the handy encatc @newsletter that the analysis
(in French) about the forerunners of C2000 in 1996-1999 was disclosed.
BO
immediately made a combined mini-examination that covers eight years. (More
follows.) We took 567 in four years before 2000 from the study by GMV conseil
and the 631 cooperation projects since 2000 (note! this latter without
translation projects), and checked them by leading organisation. Italy has not
always been the busiest: in the previous four years they were second behind
France. German organisations took the third place, both before and after 2000.
Luxembourg led the smallest number of projects and Portugal was third from
behind in both periods.
Concerning
east-central Europe, the decline of Bulgaria is the most salient feature: who
can explain?
|
|
1996-1999
|
2000-2003
|
|
EU
Member States
|
1.
France, 2. Italy, 3. Germany ... 13. Portugal, 14. Finland, 15.
Luxembourg
|
1.
Italy, 2. France, 3. Germany ... 13. Portugal, 14. Luxembourg, 15.
Ireland
|
|
East-central
Europe
|
1.
Poland, 2-3. Bulgaria, Hungary ... 8-9. Latvia, Slovakia, 10.
Lithuania
|
1.
Poland, 2. Czech Republic, 3. Romania ...
8-9. Estonia, Slovakia, 10.
Bulgaria
|
West chooses east
Coming
back to the BO analysis (not yet completed) of 2000-2003, we found that western
leaders chose eastern partners in every third
of the 565 projects led by an organisation in an EU member state. Since
almost every such case involved collaborators from more than one candidate
country, there were 318 bilateral links in 183 projects. See the most frequent
couplings:
|
Leader
|
Partner
|
In
how many projects?
|
|
German
|
Hungarian
|
13
|
|
Austrian
|
Slovenian
|
12
|
|
German
|
Polish
|
11
|
East chooses west
By definition,
each of the 48 projects led by a candidate country included partners from the
west, more than two per project, producing 116 bonds. German organisations were
the most favoured, followed by French and Italian: the most active countries in
applying for grants are also the most popular targets for collaboration.
See the three
most frequent bonds. The strong German - Hungarian liaison seems to be one way
only, BO found one single Hungarian - German link.
|
Leader
|
Partner
|
In
how many projects?
|
|
Polish
|
German
|
7
|
|
Czech
|
German
|
5
|
|
Polish
|
British
|
5
|
Lithuanians
were the most eager to co-operate with western organisations, opening the widest
span for search, reaching 10 member countries, more than anyone else from the
region.
East chooses east
Our
compasses are geared towards the west. Nearly half of the eastern-led projects
had no collaborator from the region. Slovaks were the most loyal, their 2
projects involved 5 eastern partners.
Otherwise
the sympathies were fairly even, five out of the ten candidate countries were
selected 6 times each. However, only one pair produced a higher number of joint
actions than two:
|
Leader
|
Partner
|
In
how many projects?
|
|
Hungarian
|
Romanian
|
3
|
Cents for translators
C2000
got dissected also as part of BO contribution to the survey of support
for international exchange in the area of literature run by LAF / Mercator.
Between
2000-2003, publishers from 22 countries received altogether 4,4 million euros
for translation in the frames of Culture 2000. BO related the grants to
population figures. The inhabitants of Iceland benefited by far the most: 97,5
cents in four years, followed by Norwegian per capita 16,4 cents - long winter
nights, thirst for foreign literature. Among EU members, however, the leader is
Greece with 6,2 cents. Austrians, Germans and the British collected around 0,1
cent each. BO feels inspired to find an illustrative benchmark from the
agricultural subsidies.
East
Europeans were allowed to compete from one or more years later. Lithuania took a
headstart and won 5,1 cents per inhabitant, much higher than the EU average. Not
one cent went to Polish publishers.
Happy millennary!
Lithuania
will celebrate her 1000th anniversary by hosting a European Capital
of Culture in 2009. Candidate countries broke through, see BO note.
Who reads us
Will
Lithuanians learn about the flattering mentions in this memo? This year BO site has switched on a smarter visitor
counter that spies on our readers - this is how we know that BO is neglected in
Vilnius and Kaunas. Differently from Tallinn and Tartu: more hits come from
Estonia than from Poland, Germany or Netherlands.
English is the set language of about 28%
of our visitors, second 15% French is reassuring.
Major study presented and discussed
The
text of the major study on the recent ascent of foundations in the financing of
European culture has been available for months. The official presentation of
Cultural cooperation in Europe: what role for Foundations? took place in
Genoa in February, in the the frames of a
conference.
Percentage
philantropy
Millions of citizens in east-central
Europe are wondering these days, which non-profit organisation to subsidize with
1% of their income tax. This legal
regime was initiated in the Hungarian cultural sector, and has reached a
number of countries by now.
Adéu,
Eduard! Isten veled, Péter!
Few
of you did not know Eduard Delgado,
and have not heard about his passing away. A devoted European, a proud Catalan
he was, and a true friend of BO.
BO has lost another close friend: Péter
Hidy was the chairman of the association that founded our observatory, and
which delegates the members of our board. His seat is painfully vacant now.
|