A memo sent to correspondents, friends and
acquaintances of the Budapest Observatory (BO) in May 2000
Dear Colleagues,
May may be the longest month of the year (long days, 31 of
them, no holidays etc.), when great achievements can be expected. Yes, but it also attracts meetings
and travels when people leave their offices and computers. This is why the
length of the month is not (yet) really reflected in the amount of work done around
the Budapest Observatory since the last Memo.
Countries
Two contributions arrived to the donors & tax project. With
that Slovakia equals Croatia on the top. Bulgaria, Estonia, Lithuania, Poland and
Slovenia are behind with one each. The rest, still zero. (Hungary, as you know,
is a special case.)
Best Practices
Hard to believe. Hunger for acknowledgement, greed for money,
word of promise, remorses: all these motivation factors have not produced
presentations of exemplary cases of financing cultural actions in East-Central
Europe so far (other than the two Hungarian samples). Do you know of more
effective ways?
Unesco has tried one. Mounir Bouchenaki, assistant director-general
for culture wrote a letter to the cultural ministries of the member states
asking for examples of good practice in the financing of culture. The Budapest
Observatory is mentioned in it, countries in East-Central Europe are encouraged
to send their best practice profiles directly to us. If you come across this,
warn the authorities that our e-mail address is miss-spelt in that circular
letter.
Have confidence in the young. Milena Dragicevic Sesic,
director of the summer course of the Central European University on Innovative
cultural policies and cultural management in societies in transition has agreed
to invite participants to bring along small case-descriptions to the course.
With some luck, this can lead to a nice collection. Similarly, Dorota Ilczuk
promised to encourage her students to present an exciting case from Poland.
Tax
Incentives
Work on this project had to be speeded us in order to be able
to present it at a seminar in Istria in the first days of June. The event is
organised by the Council of Europe for participants from South East Europe, as
a part of the Mosaic project.
Eight country profiles will be ready by then. Due to the
extremely condense character of the files the amount of work behind them is not
apparent at first sight. Thanks to the contributors!
Public
Grants for Cultural Projects
This is not a new project just a new name for the "Arm's
length..." one. It started as a collection of information on the arms's length
agencies of financing culture but gradually got extended to those countries,
too, where financing projects is kept in charge of the ministries. Oskar
Novotny called my attention to the inconsistency between the title and the
content. The change of name was accompanied by some rearrangement of the files,
which goes on.
So does the involvement of new countries, although no addition
was made this month.
EU
The concept is ready and from June on the Budapest Observatory
starts to collect information on the processes which are taking place in the
countries of East-Central-Europe for sake of knowing and understanding cultural
policies and, of course, financing mechanisms in the Union. In the beginning we
do it with friendly encouragement but without any official support from
Brussels. I hope soon we will deserve some.
Edmonton
I am leaving for the yearly gathering of CIRCLE, the network
on European cultural policies tomorrow. Looking forward to fostering
relationships with old and new partners there.
New
avenues
Traditionally the end, and not he beginning of summer is the
season for looking for new departures. However, the phase of primary
accumulation of information has reached a level when it is time to think of
further elaboration. We should avoid brainless growth. Analysis, meaningful
comparison, conclusions - this is where we should arrive.
The front page of the Tax incentive project shows a tiny,
embryonic attempt in this direction.
|
