|
A memo sent to correspondents, friends and
acquaintances of the Budapest
Observatory (BO) in October 2007
This
edition of BO memo is being sent to nearly 2000 addresses, most of you genuine
acquaintances. If not really, or not any longer, just click on the magic word
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
C2000 under BO eyes
Exercise
completed,
the examination of the involvement of cultural operations from east and central
Europe has now been extended to all seven
years of the culture
programme of the European Commission between 2000-2006. The full text
of the analysis is downloadable. Wherever we go in the next few months, we will carry
printed copies and distribute them to interested colleagues, friends and
acquaintances.
The
following drawings show the intensity of co-operation between west and east:
how often did western project leaders choose partners from the new member
states during the seven years (picture on the left), and whom did eastern
winners co-opt into their projects (on the right).
The
previous versions, based on six years, were attached to the memo of May 2006. The
basic patterns changed little between the sixth and seventh years. Strangely,
although the number of eastern project leaders grew quicker than western ones,
the frequency of eastern organisations recruited into western projects
increased faster than the other way round. In other words, the drawing on the
left became even more crowded. All big countries produced increases, especially
France;
the bulk of the amplified attention in the final year was collected by Czechs
and Romanians.
On the
right, Estonia
is the only country that profited visibly from the modest westbound growth of
the seventh year.
Between the jungle and the desert
BO is
member of the European festival research project (EFRP) consortium. Following two seminars in Leicester and Le Mans,
done in conjunction with De Montfort University and France Festivals
respectively, EFRP joined forces now with Circle,
and the annual round table conference of this European network was dedicated to
the
festival policy of public authorities, entitled Festival
Jungle - Policy Desert? The meeting was hosted by Interarts, Barcelona. BO contributed, among
others, to the discussion on what to recommend to
authorities.
The Saxonian way
One
recommendation would be to watch whether the Saxonian way works. The Free State
of Saxony called for a survey about music festivals in that province. But the
authorities did not finish by reading the findings.
They are using the researchers
as change agents for identifying what needs to improve and how, in order that
Saxonian music festivals could satisfy their stakeholders even better - as we
learned in Barcelona.
Re-drawing Circle
Circle is the oldest network in
European cultural policy research. Its members present at the Barcelona conference selected a small team to
elaborate on how to adapt to the rapidly changing environment. Just like the
conference, this process, too, takes place with Interarts patronage.
Drawing new circles
People
from European music export agencies gathered
in Budapest in
October to discuss common matters. In principle one another's competitors, they
soon established that they can be successful only if imports also thrive, which
requires exchange and co-operation. So they departed with the intention to keep
networking, especially in circles where at least as much concern is voiced
about sales as about values. Tough partisans of the western rock scene showed
genuine empathy towards their fledgling colleagues in east Europe
- like their host MXH.
Capital for culture
At
first sight misfits in the programme of the music export conference,
nevertheless representatives of past and future European capitals of culture
held a lively session among themselves. They could even surprise one another.
Those naïve colleagues from Cork and Lille were astonished
that incumbent east European cities had no definite financial resources years
ahead, and that political influence is a recurrent concern.
Lux
The
winner of Lux,
the new film prize, is chosen by secret ballot of those members of the European
Parliament who have seen all three short-listed films - BO wonders how this was
tested: by cross-questioning randomly chosen MPs? For selecting the short-list,
a panel of 17 people, mainly professional film critics had scanned hundreds of
European feature films made in the scope of twelve months. The three films were
from Germany, Portugal and Romania
- this latter was the Cannes
laureate "4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days".
A nice
thing about the prize is that the winning film - this year the German film "The Edge of Heaven" - will be subtitled
in the 23 languages of the Union.
Sarkozy re-edited
A
friend of BO called our attention to a strange dialogue. President
Sarkozy's open letter to the culture minister was published in August. A group
of French citizens treated the text like a Wikipedia stub and set to
collaborative editing. The first sentence in the original exalted about the
desire for change manifested in the presidential campaign, while the re-editors
lamented about the indifference towards cultural issues during the canvassing.
The original text repeats the words président (and its derivatives)
twice as often as the "counter-letter", which favours the use of république
and gouvernement.
Sarko
stresses the teaching of cultural values of France - and of Europe and the
world, add his co-authors; the president calls for more determination in
promoting French culture - those free citizens recall the obligations contained
in the Unesco convention on diversity. Just to quote a few items.
|