|
A
memo sent to correspondents, friends and acquaintances of the Budapest Observatory (BO)
in January 2007
What
occupied BO in January, will lead to products later. This memo is filled with
observation on other agencies' output.
Here
comes the SUN
A
few days remain to apply
to the summer course on cultural
policy making in the post-communist countries,
to be held between 16-27July at the Central European University, Budapest.
Using
Compendium
Compendium
(a joint venture between the Council of Europe and ERICarts)
got
a new design in January. The news
section
reads fluently and deserves the name. Take Sweden: after
the elections in September a new government entered in October, and Compendium
already presents
a number of changes in cultural policy.
This
has really become a transversal information base. E.g: which countries have
recently taken measures in the digitisation of culture? Digitisation dominates
the heritage sector in Slovenia;
a national programme began in Croatia;
in the Netherlands
this is co-ordinated by a Digital Heritage Association; Spain
focuses on a national collection of digital images of museum
exhibits.
Another
example: theatre laws appear to be an eastern feature. Albania,
Croatia
and Georgia
just passed one each, Lithuania,
Moldova,
Romania,
Russia
and Ukraine
have had one for some time, and preparations are taking place in Azerbaijan,
Bulgaria
and Hungary.
In the west, a theatre law seems to operate in Austria
only.
Any
student writing a paper on cultural consumption or participation will find a
nice comparative
table
created by Mikko. Nevertheless, lots of things remain to discover and wonder
about in chapter
8.2.1.
Intercultural
efforts
The
Compendium has an easy to handle collection.
Go and check for yourself for the most convincing ones from the 50 cases on
display (end of January), many from the west, few from the east. From the
latter, BO vote goes to the Bielany project, Poland, as well
as the Serbian offer.
More
intercultural efforts
We
knew for long that intercultural dialogue is one of the three goals of the new
seven year EU
culture programme .
We
were sure that Germany would dedicate a subchapter
to intercultural dialogue (linked to migrant integration), in the actual
presidency
programme.
However,
the 18-month
programme
of the German, Portuguese and Slovenian presidencies surprised us by mentioning
intercultural dialogue in the strategic framework, as well as at three
different parts in the comprehensive programme (paras 25, 81 and
118).
Discrimination
in Europe
It
is easier to overcome a conflict if you know how people feel about
it.
Eurobarometer
surveyed
European opinions about these sensitive issues last summer. Of the six forms of
discrimination examined in the survey, discrimination on the ground of ethnic
origin is perceived to take place most widely. Swedes, above all, show concern
about this form of discrimination: 85% of them believe it is widespread in their
country, and 69% are dissatisfied about efforts against it. They also top the
list with the view that being a Roma is a disadvantage in their society (about
90%, while in Bulgaria and
Romania 60% only believe so). The
reader is bewildered: is Sweden really the worst in this
respect? Or the contrary: have such attitudes made it the most tolerant place of
all?
With
so few migrants (putting the Roma in brackets) in the eastern countries, fewer
people felt the presence of ethnic discrimination than the European average of
64%: a bare 23% of Lithuanians sensed this evil in their country.
Do
people of another ethnic origin enrich your nation's culture? With large
differences between countries, two out of three Europeans said yes! Of course,
Swedes gave the highest number of positive answer (86%), Germany and UK, the biggest
two, sitting on the average, and most easterners at the skeptic end. There was a
resistant block in Central Europe: only 46-51%
of Austrians, Slovenes and Czechs felt richer with other kinds of culture on
their lands.
Festival
budgets
The
synthèse
of
the research on French festivals - mentioned in previous
BO memo
- was made available. As a first exploitation, BO related its budget
approximations to a previous
exercise:
|
Income
|
UK
|
Hungary
|
France
|
|
Expenses
|
UK
|
Hungary
|
France
|
|
Own
Income
|
42%
|
34%
|
36,5%
|
|
Arts
|
44%
|
47%
|
51%
|
|
Public
Support
|
36,7%
|
42,1%
|
51,5%
|
|
Technical
|
12%
|
18%
|
18%
|
|
Private
Support
|
17%
|
20,3%
|
12%
|
|
Communication
|
11%
|
9%
|
11%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office
|
8%
|
9%
|
20%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Staff
|
16%
|
6%
|
-
|
|
Other
|
4,3%
|
3,6%
|
-
|
|
Other
|
9%
|
11%
|
-
|
|
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
|
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
(UK:
75 festivals in 2000/2001, Hungary:
211 festivals in 2004, France:
86 festivals in 2005)
Patterns
are basically similar. Differences are telling - note the lines on public
support and the arts spending. Further exploitation follows.
Eurostat
choo choo
Eurostat
does not entirely neglect culture. Sitting on a train is a classical cultural
commonplace. Does it apply to today's Europe?
On the increase - Eurostat
tells us.
The average European travelled 789 meters by train in 2005, which
is 2,2% more than a year earlier. French people are the most railbound with
1277
meters, followed by Belgians, Danes and Austrians - above
a kilometer each, while easterners are below the average, except for Hungarians.
At the very bottom, Lithuanians hardly know the feeling, with
82
meters a year. (BO divided Eurostat figures by
population.)
BO
hopes Eurostat soon provides us with data that are more directly connected to
cultural habits.
|