A
memo sent to correspondents, friends and acquaintances of the Budapest Observatory (BO)
in May 2006
This
memo features the visual demonstration of cultural co-operation in Europe, hot off the print, i.e. from BO desks.
German-Polish
axis
The
attached drawings show the dynamics of co-operation in the frames of the Culture
2000 programme. The thickness of the arrows corresponds to the frequency of
selecting co-organisers from a given country during the six years between
2000-2005. Both drawings are dominated by the bonds between German and Polish
operators: the former chose the latter in 19 projects, and Polish project
leaders involved German co-organisers in 14 cases. The biggest old member state
with the biggest new one, with a long common border, nothing to wonder about.
|
|
The
price of analysis
BO
is proud of these illustrations, also the entire analysis of the various aspects
of Culture 2000 projects - this will be printed as well as put on digital
display during summer, to replace the previous
attempt.
The feeling of accomplishment relates to the pains caused by the lamentable
state of the sources stored on the culture
website
of the European Commission. The past records of C2000 grants contain errors and
contradictions; our correspondents have also pointed at a few more. The system
seems to serve for ad hoc release only and not for reliable documentation.
The
Commission delays
Last
autumn a call
encouraged "bodies pursuing an aim of general European interest in the field of
culture" to apply for annual operating grants before the end of October 2005.
BO
would be pleased to comment the list of winners. Instead, one reads the
following announcement:
the "probable written communication of the results of the selection procedure to
the applicants" takes place in June; probably in June, about money that was
supposed to enable operation from January on. BO is not affected directly, yet
wonders what is going on here. Indifference? Incompetence? Confusion?
Commission.
The
2729th Council Meeting
The
council of education and culture ministers of the Union sat on the 18th and 19th of
May. Ministers "reached
political agreement"
on a number of major issues: Culture 2007,
European year of intercultural dialogue 2008, Citizens for Europe programme, Unesco
convention on cultural diversity, strengthening European creative industries
etc.
BO
wishes to help memo readers interpret such events. However, we lack clues. We
have no idea what was changed by these decisions. BO usually disapproves if
cultural policy is limited to public budget figures. The absence of any
reference to funding is a bit too much of diplomatic bandage, though.
From
global to urban
The
Unesco convention
basically and originally relates to issues of world trade, and is particularly
geared to the developing countries. It became, however, the trampoline to
discussing the burning issue of intercultural relationship, especially in cities
in western Europe. (See also the latest
BO memo .)
This
is how cultural diversity was treated in May in Bratislava, at the annual conference of the
European network of cultural administration training centres:
ENCATC
(not a user friendly name, is it?). BO was present, and told about the three
stages of intercultural relations, ranging from reciprocal exchanges (fair
balance), through inclusion (empathy and curiosity), to organic interaction that
can produce new quality and new identity.
Demographic
diversity
Eurostat
published data from national censuses that show the percentage of foreigners in the EU. The
total figure is just under 5.5%. Country figures show great variance, Luxembourg
with 38.6% and Slovakia with 0.6%. In most countries
the largest group of non-nationals is from Europe. In the UK, for example, the biggest community of foreigners
is from Ireland, whereas
in Ireland from the UK. This does not fit into the cultural
diversity pattern as discussed in Bratislava. There are three countries, however,
where citizens of Turkey
are the biggest non-native group: Denmark,
Germany and the Netherlands (where the entire percentage
of foreigners is 5,0 - 8,9 - 4,3%).
Linguistic
diversity
The
EU is conscious about language issues. This is demonstrated by the fact that
Irish is an official language and
will become a full working language on 1 January 2007. Also, the list of
the eight key competences for lifelong learning, as established at the 2729th
council meeting, starts with communication in the mother tongue.
The
two things, however, are not the same. A minister's speech was
once
interrupted by applause, when he said: "Instead of translating bureaucratic
texts, policies of multilingualism should concentrate on education, literary
translations and other ways of support to minority languages." In the spirit of the Bratislava conference I
would add: including newly established minorities.
Global
diversity
Checking
back on the original issue, BO wondered what had been achieved in the realm of
l'exception culturelle. In May, Peter
Mandelson, the commissioner in charge, held two important speeches,
one in Switzerland, the
other
in the European Parliament. The statements portrayed the position of the
European Community with regard to the Doha round of world trade talks. The word globalisation occurred over thirty times
- diversity or culture not once.
Market
or society?
This
was the subtitle of a hearing,
held by the EU parliamentary committee in charge (among others) of culture on
3rd May. Diversity was basically treated in the Unesco sense.
Speakers regretted that cross-border transactions geared by big capital cause
harm to local, national values. It was argued that certain protective measures
can "secure a brighter future for young talent and...
keep the dream alive". When, however,
actors from third countries are involved, this "is one of the best means to
bring people together."
The
hearing was not on culture: it was on football.
Festival
research
In
Bratislava, BO
could start recruiting partners and contributors to the European festival
research project (EFRP),
where we are consortium members. If you are interested, read the two page
leaflet
and write to
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
|