|
A memo sent to correspondents, friends and
acquaintances of the Budapest
Observatory (BO) in November 2007
Resurrection
is habitual for BO, digging for lifeless information in various cemeteries of
data in the hope of reviving and presenting them to the curious.
Lisbon
pilgrimage
Where
would you prefer to attend a seminar on the role of culture in the Lisbon process? Of course
in Lisbon. The
invention of the creative sector has changed our mindset. But certainly, our
vocabulary. This, among
others, is what BO said on this
occasion.
Mappers' reunion in Sofia
BO is
looking forward to reading a paper from Milena on
cultural mapping, ranging from the atlas culturels to the variety of
marketing surveys and partner searches, as she reviewed the genre in Sofia on 17 November, at
the workshop organised by the European network of cultural administration
training centres (ENCATC).
Mapping
cultural industries was one of the focal points: there have been a number of
such exercises on the Balkans lately. Bulgaria also joined the list of
countries that conducted a WIPO-coordinated
survey on the contribution of the creative (copyright based) sector to the
economy.
Is culture competitive?
What
about the other side of the fence? Do analysts of European competitiveness
properly highlight the contribution of the creative and cultural branches? No,
they don't. The 112-page EU industrial structure 2007, the latest brochure on
the economic output of the Union does not
contain the words creative or copyright. The list of European
competitiveness, measured by its trade balance with the rest of the world, is
led by pharmaceuticals: this sector requires not exactly the kind of creativity
that culture offers. Surprisingly, printing and publishing is at the fifth
place, just behind aircraft industry. (This is not a European extravaganza: in
the USA
print & publishing is at third position!) There is no other
culture-intensive sector on the list.
The
chapters on consumption patterns show that entertainment society (Erlebnisgesellschaft)
is still a long way down the road. Recreational and cultural services make
up 3,5% of private consumption in the Union,
with newspapers, books and stationery another 1,6%. On the other hand,
Europeans spend 11,5% on food and 2% on tobacco.
A pocketful of numbers
Eurostat
has made a small but significant step by publishing a pocketbook
on cultural statistics. It is not the product of carefully planned strategic
data collection, but admittedly a medley of available statistics that relate to
culture.
The
chapter on publishing confuses poor BO. Eurostat says that this branch stands
for 2,7% of value added in manufacturing in the Union:
is this enough to occupy the fifth position in the champions' league of
competitiveness, as defined in the brochure cited above? On the other hand,
the pocketbook sheds some more light on this subsector: out of the roughly 36
million people in "print and publishing" about 750 thousand are in "publishing
of books, newspapers, journals and periodicals", the other 35,25 million in
manufacturing. An army of printers.
BO
will recycle some more of the stuff included in the pocketbook, pertaining to
our observation remit, as it is done further down in this memo.
Intelligence in hiding
The
European Cultural Foundation assisted the Committee for Civic Initiative in the
Serbian city of Niš to publish the findings of a
large scale survey on the cultural needs, habits and taste of citizens of Serbia and Macedonia. The book presents a lot
of data on these challenging issues, on which BO will chew on. Especially if
the text is available on-line, which is still to be expected from Niš.
The
reader is impressed by the profundity of the theoretical framework offered at
the beginning of the book, and also of each chapter. A propos Macedonia, pages 5-7 of a Council
of Europe publication
on the cultural policy of that country offer similar intellectual stimulation,
describing the challenges of post-national, post-independence cultural policies.
Cultural Brussels
BO
found an odd event for those in or near Brussels.
The European Economic and Social Committee is arranging a debate
over the cultural functions of large administrative hubs in the post-modern
era. The road from Ford to Florida.
Cultural employment revisited
The
Eurostat pocketbook prompted BO to revisit its examination
of an earlier issue of the same data. We were surprised then to find that
western countries employed more people in culture than we do in the east. We
also wondered whether when data arrive from Poland (the biggest member country
in our region), the picture would remain the same.
Comparing
data from 2002 and 2005 we find that the gap between old and new EU members has
narrowed - not because we could add Poland, Romania and Croatia (dobro došli!), but in spite.
|
|
Cultural workers
% of all
|
Graduated
cultural workers % of all
|
Temporary
cultural workers % of all
|
Part-time
cultural workers % of all
|
Cultural workers
with 2nd job % of all
|
Self-employed
cultural workers % of all
|
|
EU 15 in 2002
|
2,57
|
1,03
|
0,49
|
0,70
|
0,23
|
0,76
|
|
EU 15 in 2005
|
2,53
|
1,17
|
0,42
|
0,62
|
0,18
|
0,72
|
|
East 8 in 2002
|
1,99
|
0,89
|
0,21
|
0,21
|
0,13
|
0,35
|
|
East 8 in 2005
|
2,30
|
1,04
|
0,21
|
0,26
|
0,15
|
0,31
|
|
East 11 in 2005
|
2,11
|
0,83
|
0,20
|
0,20
|
0,11
|
0,31
|
With regard to cultural employment, western
and eastern EU members still show different patterns. In some cases very
different: the proportion of part time employment is three times higher in the
west than in the east. Peeping behind the figures could we tell which side is
to rejoice, which is to regret.
Warsaw rally for five million
Whenever the active kernel of the European Forum
for the Arts and Heritage (EFAH) gathers -
as it happened
in Warsaw,
attended also by BO - one wonders about the numbers behind. Eurostat has now
offered an answer, giving the number of people employed in culture in EU27 as 4 940 300.
|